"The tragedy of Earth is not that so many died. Death is an inevitable part of life. The tragedy is that so many died as victims. When the crisis came, they were helpless, unable to use their deaths to buy anything of value. Millions of otherwise intelligent people had been tricked into ignoring a fundamental truth: that no man has any rights if he is unable to personally defend them."
— Col. Corazon Santiago, "Planet: A Survivalist's Guide" (from GURPS Alpha Centauri supplement)
The first one follows Santiago and Commissioner Lal’s families.
The Colonel excepts her son from the worst of the bloody Spartan child-rearing strategies
In other news, ESA's BepiColombo mission has passed a major milestone:
-Transfer stage completed first ion engine burn
-All science instruments passed checks
-Ground operations teams still working hard during cruise to Mercury
-Preparations for 2020 Earth gravity assist underway
You also look like the prime enemy of the Dark blobs
15:01
You can also form a giant ring around the dark blob by joining hands and use the remaining arms to grab the blob from all sides and slowly shrink the ring, while using the remaining hands to sqiwrkug the dark matter from their body(edited)
Oh, good grief, people.
We now have a cornfield. Repeated and persistent trying of my patience and/or annoying of other Discord users can get you sent to the cornfield, for a specified time or entirely at moderatorial discretion, meaning that while you can still read, you can’t post anywhere outside #thecornfield .
16:27
And @Unknown , achievement unlocked: three days in the cornfield for relentless shitposting.
you know, as dumb as the 'coca-cola for blood' idea was, now It's got me pondering what the biological use of a high CO2 content in the bloodstream would be. ( A high sugar content seems like it'd just be for high energy behavior or whatever )
18:27
....oh yeah, CO2 is a waste byproduct of the ATP cycle
18:29
So, in a mammal the combo would tend to imply the muscles are working at a rate that the lungs cannot dump CO2 fast enough
Hmmmmm. So while maybe you could design a warbeast to tolerate those conditions, still doesn't have a clear upshot compared to just venting the CO2 through the lungs
It could be a bicarbonate that forms CO2 on exposure to air. Photosynthetic organisms might also want to keep their respiration by-products on site for a while too
I'd need to do some more chemistry research before declaring this even slightly plausible, but: hydrogen-breathers in the 'verse use reducing reactions to generate energy rather than oxidation. Any applications for CO2 in that?
there's not many reducing reactions for CO2 that generate energy and don't also generate poison or solids
20:04
although 'poison' is a rather species specific thing
20:05
I think it might be more likely an anaerobic tolerance situation? Intermittent breathers like whales and optimised sprinters like cheetah can have blood concentrations of CO2 that would be fatal to humans
right, this is a very random question, but does anyone have any favourite brightly coloured reptiles? Amphibians potentially accepted too. I'm trying to design colour schemes for my Seraphon army and I need at least 3 more.
Seraphon = a Warhammer army, specifically the fantasy game Age of Sigmar, and they're celestial mayan-aztec themed dinosaurs riding other dinosaurs.
I am writing scifi from the perspective of a sophont with a more avian body plan (long neck and tail counterbalancing over limbs), so I just got to describe humans as "sort of tubular" instead of 'proper' bipeds.
the alien is used to sort of stoat-like burrowing critters, so he's thinking that this is kind of what you'd get if you took one and flipped it 90 degrees, and that it's weird. And speculating the humans were burrowing creatures, but isn't quite sure how they made the leap to being on the surface upright.
(On brightly colored reptiles, I'm kinda fond of the various coral sneks. There's one with a gorgeous pattern of emerald-and-gold diamonds, too, but I cannot recall its name right now.)
So, this morning I have learned of the Titanoboa, which is exactly what you'd think it is.
A prehistoric snek that could reach 42' long and 2500 lbs. Thought to have preyed on giant crocodiles, and let us face it, whatever the fuck else it wanted to prey on.
Only died out (according to the fossil record) about 50 000 years ago. Only died out (according to the since proven pretty reliable) aboriginal oral stories about 25 000 years ago. Very rarely there are potential sightings of it today. (Almost certainly it's people seeing large pythons and panicking)
there was an article on the news tonight about a 6m python having to be removed from someone's house and carted off in a wheelie bin. Because the snake catcher did not bring a big enough bag
yeah. When your country has 7 of the world's 10 most venomous to human snakes, and the correct response to snakes is taught in school from age 5, there isn't much excuse
amusing (to me) fail: online groceries has been confused by my purchasing patterns and thinks that I am currently menstruating and is offering me deals on pads and tampons XD
Though I did accidentally keep my friend’s emergency period chocolate in my room after a late movie night, I was lead to understand the magnitude of my mistake about a week later
I am kinda surprised that there is no menstrual medication exploiting theobromine, but then it probably isn't worth the development costs when it's so easy to just go and buy dark chocolate
23:02
Granted, I'm not sure how much of the benefit is medicinal and how much is placebo. All I know if that for many women chocolate measurably improves period cramps and really that's all that matters.
I think when we get to properly editing our bodies then conditional fertility will be one of the things people with uterii will want most. Sadly, also one of the things that the antiscience people will screech about the loudest.
the big issue with condoms is their incompatibility with certain lubricants, spermicides, and toys; anything that requires you to know material interactions introduces failure modes
Because I’m all but certain I’ve seen some specially marketed with spermicides. Yeah, living in a dorm with a rather ... fluid living situation means I deal with these concerns a lot
00:16
But I think you could get away with a tougher but possibly more porous structure if you only cared about fluid cleanup
It’s question-answering time here at the Eldraeverse! A reader writes: Two questions- 1) Is there a food item for the Eldrae that has assumed the same memetic status as bacon for humans? 2) W…
08:14
Also: El val telalélharn quor olmanár elén alírvelv .
I was thinking of reputational punishment.
It follows $TARGET around and shames them. Preferably when it recognizes something shameful, courtesy of some machine learning, but maybe just adding a WEEK OF SHAME to the higher-level penalties would be useful.
well, the basic problem with those is you still need the material to be 'tight' enough that hydrogen doesn't get through between the other molecules, and hydrogen is just a raw proton and usually an electron
22:06
so on some level you're asking to hold large numbers of protons in place using molecules larger than protons
The best materials are less about close packing crystal coefficient and more being made of a substance the hydrogen prefers to adsorb on than permeate through.
You know, going through a tragedy sucks. But when you endure that, and then procede to try to ruin as many other innocent people's lives as you can get away with you aren't a victim any more.
09:14
You are just a shitty person who has an excuse to pull the mask off
And, in defense of epistemic standards, just because assholes attack you doesn't mean you're not an asshole. Exhibit A: the entire US political system. Exhibit B: Most celebrity infighting. Exhibit C: High school. Exhi....
I have seen a case where someone was sued by the family of a women killed in a car accident. He wasn't driving the car. He was driving a different car and took evasive action to avoid the other car hitting him
Family claimed that if he hadn't moved the car would have hit him instead and their daughter would still be alive, ergo it was his actions that led to her death
Suing in the US legal system is mostly a technique to make people shut up and go away, either because they can't afford to defend the case, or because it's infinitely cheaper to throw money at the plaintiff even if they have no possible case in equity.
It has within delta of buggerall to do with any of its purported functions.
yes, but how much are they willing to put up for it? They can just let it drag on until their opponent's sponsors move on to the next tragedy of the week(edited)
given that everyone keeps saying "this will safely come down in the pacific away from everyone" and then hitting australia, I do not trust the ability to aim something as fast as an asteroid
Anyway: this is almost certainly encouraged by people who want to make an end-run around the necessity of legislating gun bans, because it's a guaranteed vote-loser. Which one would think politicians would realize after any new regulation causes yet another sales spike, but hey, it's a democracy, not a clueocracy.
considering that The Narrative has taken the mask off in the last couple years and is now about banning all semi-autos they don't even get to play the nice feel good shit they used to pedal
Especially since, statistically, it's a non-issue. If you look down the big list of causes of death, there are far, far, far better things to address if what you care about is actually saving lives on a rational basis.
Rather than scary-cycling and claiming victory in the culture war.
Eh, I'm on the opposite side to you guys on this issue. For me, having a weapon that is optimised purely to kill a lot of humans very fast is, by defintion, suspicious behaviour. And attempting to claim any sort of self defence argument is laughable. If you've got it because you think it's cool and want to waste a lot of ammo safely at a gun range, SAY THAT.
Also: for myself, it' a point of principle. In a free society, the baseline is that you're entitled to own absolutely anything you want unless it's mala in se . What is not prohibited is permitted.
Rip into me if you want. I still say that if you can kill a whole room full of people before someone can hurl a chair at you, there aren't many non-murderous uses I can think of for that that aren't better served by other weapons. And hog hunters here do just find with bolt action rifles
@Morgrim Moon Not trying to rip, sorry, but there is so very much misinformation out there I do like to check that we're using terms accurately. And semi-automatic is one of those terms that's being particularly abused at present.
People want you to think it means big, scary, military rifles.
But since it actually means "a weapon that does not require manual ejecting, reloading, and recocking", it covers almost every gun on the market today, period, down to .22 plinkers.
tl;dr People with an agenda are lying to you .
And if you assemble that gasoline into a bomb it will be assumed you intend to use it. And people will act accordingly. So I'm never sure why guns are NOT treated in the same way.
If you're carrying it to a vehicle or your own home nobody bats an eyelid. Carrying it to a public place and they assume you're about to burn a building or person
Well, yeah. I mean, it doesn't take practicing much chemistry to be able to make everything from bombs to poison gas out of common household chemicals. (And since I have the remains of various chemical-involving businesses around here and practice electronics as a hobby, this place is practically a freakin' arsenal.)
Pocket knifes are good tools and poor weapons. Acceptable to carry in many areas. A bowie knife is a good tool only in limited circumstances not seen in urban areas. It will be seen as a tool in the deep bush and a weapon in the city and treated accordingly. A bolt action rifle is seen as a tool mostly, unless in an urban area with no game or pests. A 'scary military style gun' is seen as a weapon, period, and you'd better be in uniform or assumed to be about to mass murder
So yeah, this is my cultural context. "Is there a good reason to have it? No worries mate. Are all the reasons bad ones? We'll assume you've got it to cause shit"
In NY until recently, the AR-15 was banned, the Ruger semi-auto wasn't. They shot the same ammo, could mount the same optics, similar barrel length, and same capacity. the difference? One had wooden furniture
And considering there's a railyard in town... I mean, it's not like killing a quarter-million people would be trivial , but we're not exactly talking impossible, either. One good fuel-air IED in the right spot when a bunch of chlorine tankers are coming through town...
But the point was @Morgrim Moon people tend to focus on "looks scary" when banning guns they don't like instead of what makes them actually potentially dangerous
I also think there are some good common sense (to me at least) gun control laws that have nothing to do with restricting what guns you can have. Like "you need a safe place to store your gun".
or "if you don't report your weapon as stolen you WILL be considered partially culpable for any injuries done with it, because if your kid can get at it you have been neglegent"
Well, you can have a debate about that; here it's a gun safe bolted to the floor or in a locked case within 5m of you unless you are using it, but that's arguably overkill. "Shoved loaded down the back of your underwear" or "sitting loaded on your bedside table" is NOT a safe place
One of them is that if you need it, you may not have time to frack around with assorted protective devices. A home invader or rabid animal isn't going to wait for you to painstakingly unsafe and ready your weapon before attacking you.
poking in for a second (yeah my focus is bad why'd you ask )
Childproof locks have already killed a few kids who weren't able to defend themselves. The correct answer is to do your damn job as a parent and teach your children gun safety
The other one is that it inverts the presumption of innocence in much the same ways as "attractive nuisance" laws. The only person responsible, justly speaking, for stealing something or what they do with the stolen thing is the thief .
In the vast majority of circumstances a gun is a shocking weapon for close quarters home defence, so I don't really consider 'an axe murderer bursting into your bedroom' as a great argument
true, I would be of the 'stab them if I had a blade or otherwise claw their eyes out' school immediately after, but I'm aware that my ability to reflexively maim is a result of trauma and most humans can't
It may work if all you're doing is trying to buy time to run away, which comes with two problems. One, you may not be, and probably aren't, faster than they are. Two, this is my house , within which is my family and all my stuff. I don't have to run from shit.
I have a kukri >.> Admittedly I haven't sharpened it because I haven't gotten around to learning how, but it's a plenty fine blunt object and intimidating as it is
You've heard of "red hot" and "white hot" to describe searing temperatures. But what about "blue hot"? That's the surreal hue of Indonesia's Kawah Ijen Volcano, which glows with an otherworldly "blue lava" at night. The mountain contains large amounts of pure sulfur, which em...
And @Overmind I was joining in the sass, because, well, society has declared that because I have past an arbitrary line I have more rights than he does, and I’m in the mood to flex a little
but yeah, If I were a school administrator I'd be far more worried about Reddit than Pornhub, simply because of how many more kids are likely to actually access it during school hours
Yes, that's why I suggested "Faraday cage" or something - saying "jamming" implies you're actively doing something rather than just having thick walls.
so when I saw a parody of it on a t-shirt in the mall, when I was with two acquaintances from summer PE, we had to make awkward eye contact before someone eventually pointed it out first
11:04
doesn't matter if you use it, it's pop-culture osmosis at this point, from comment memes if nothing else
Back to gun control, gun safety should be taught whether or not you actually have a gun: perhaps in school? Obviously, it would have to be opt-out-able.